Drata vs Secureframe: GRC Platform Comparison
The short answer
Drata vs Secureframe: Drata and Secureframe both sell compliance automation across frameworks such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001, but they diverge on packaging and go-to-market. Drata publishes no dollar amounts on its pricing page and routes every tier to a demo, while Secureframe lists a Fundamentals tier at $7,500/year with upper tiers quote-gated.
This period Drata shipped agentic third-party risk management and an MCP connector, and Secureframe is recruiting a founding Defense sales team alongside a Microsoft co-hosted CMMC webinar.
Quick comparison
| Drata | Secureframe | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary value | Automate compliance, manage internal and third-party risk, and prove security posture across 30+ frameworks | Automate compliance and reduce risk with automation backed by in-house compliance experts and former auditors |
| Target market | Startups to enterprises, including GitLab, Brex, T-Mobile and OpenAI; 8,500+ customers | SMB and enterprise buyers, with a dedicated push into the Defense Industrial Base for CMMC |
| Pricing model | Subscription, sales-led quote-based; Foundation caps at 50 FTEs; no dollar amounts published | Annual subscription; Fundamentals priced at $7,500/year, Complete and Defense quote only; no free tier |
| Key differentiator | Agentic AI for questionnaire responses, third-party risk scoring and control mapping, plus a SafeBase-powered Trust Center | In-house compliance and former-auditor team, Comply AI remediation, and Secureframe Defense with SPRS scoring, SSP and POA&M generation |
| Best for | Teams wanting one platform spanning compliance, trust center, TPRM and AI agent governance | Defense contractors and teams that want audit support from former auditors and a priced entry tier |
| Customer sentiment | No review data available in this dataset | No review data available in this dataset |
| Starting price | Contact sales (subscription, sales-led quote-based) | $7,500/year (~$625/mo) (Annual subscription; entry tier priced, upper tiers quote-gated; no free tier) |
Get the weekly Drata vs Secureframe briefing — free
Drop your email and we track this market for you — every Drata and Secureframe move (pricing, launches, hiring, positioning), confidence-scored in one weekly cited briefing.
Secureframe lists its Fundamentals tier at $7,500/year while Drata publishes no dollar amounts on its pricing page and routes every tier to a demo.
Prices as published by each vendor, checked 7 October 2026; estimates are marked est.
Pricing breakdown
Drata
- FoundationContact sales · subscription, sales-led quote-based
- Up to 50 FTEs
- 1 pre-mapped framework (SOC 2, ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials, HIPAA, GDPR)
- Pre-built integrations, risk management, custom controls
- Compliance as Code and open API access
- AdvancedContact sales · subscription, sales-led quote-based
- Everything in Foundation
- Any available framework
- Custom connections and tests
- Custom fields and formulas
- EnterpriseContact sales · subscription, sales-led quote-based
- Everything in Advanced
- Risk Management Pro and Compliance as Code Pro
- User Access Review
- Add-ons: Workspaces, Custom Frameworks, Agentic TPRM Assessment
- Assurance (Foundation/Advanced/Enterprise)Contact sales · subscription, sales-led quote-based
- Branded Trust Center
- Up to 100 approved domains at Foundation
- Questionnaire assistance up to 100
- SCIM, API and webhooks scale by tier
- Third-Party Risk ManagementContact sales · subscription, sales-led quote-based
- Vendor inventory sync and enrichment
- Agentic inherent and residual risk scoring
- Vendor questionnaire automation
- Third-Party Risk Register and AI chat
Secureframe
- Fundamentals (Secureframe Comply)$7,500/year (~$625/mo) · Annual subscription; entry tier priced, upper tiers quote-gated; no free tier
- Infrastructure Monitoring
- Custom Frameworks, Controls and Tests
- Evidence Collection
- Personnel Management
- Complete (Secureframe Comply)Quote only · Annual subscription; entry tier priced, upper tiers quote-gated; no free tier
- Everything in Fundamentals
- Advanced Third-Party Risk Management
- Advanced Risk Management
- Advanced User Access Reviews
- Defense (Secureframe Defense)Quote only · Annual subscription; entry tier priced, upper tiers quote-gated; no free tier
- Everything in Complete
- SPRS Score Tracker
- System Security Plan (SSP)
- Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M)
Drata publishes no dollar amounts on /pricing; every tier funnels to 'Get Started' (a demo), and Foundation caps at 50 FTEs. Secureframe prices in USD, all tiers annual, with Complete and Defense showing 'Get a quote' only; Fundamentals includes 1 framework and 1 custom automated test, with extra frameworks and workspaces as add-ons.
Recent moves
Drata
- Drata is recasting AI agent governance as a standalone category while shipping agentic TPRM and an MCP connector, giving enterprise buyers a single-platform story that can pull budget away from narrower point solutions.
Secureframe
- Secureframe is building a founding Defense sales team and co-hosting a Microsoft CMMC webinar, deepening its push into defense-contractor compliance where CMMC readiness drives the deal.
Positioning
Drata
How they describe themselves
“Drata describes itself as 'The Agentic Trust Management Platform,' using autonomous AI agents to automate compliance, manage internal and third-party risk, and continuously prove security posture across 30+ frameworks.”
What we see them doing
CEO Adam Markowitz is arguing that AI agent governance is already its own category rather than a GRC add-on, a push to own a buying conversation before rivals define it.
Secureframe
How they describe themselves
“Secureframe positions its platform as automating compliance, improving security and reducing risk, with automation backed by what it calls world-class experts, including in-house compliance staff and former auditors.”
What we see them doing
Secureframe is recruiting SMB and Enterprise Account Executives for a founding Defense sales team aimed at the Defense Industrial Base, paired with a Nov 10 CMMC webinar co-hosted with Microsoft's DIB Chief Security Architect.
Sources: B2B SaaS Competitive Positioning: AI Agent Framing · Drata: 83% Report Third-Party Breaches — October 2026
What our monitoring sees
Drata's CEO is publicly recasting AI agent governance as its own category, which will shape how buyers scope GRC budgets
IndustryLens analysis, based on B2B SaaS Competitive Positioning: AI Agent FramingDrata bundled agentic TPRM, MCP and an EU CRA framework in one release, showing a shipping cadence buyers will compare against
IndustryLens analysis, based on Drata: 83% Report Third-Party Breaches — October 2026When to choose which
When to choose Drata
Choose Drata when you want one platform spanning compliance automation, trust center, third-party risk and AI agent governance, and you are prepared for a sales-led, quote-based process with no published dollar amounts.
When to choose Secureframe
Choose Secureframe when you want a published entry price ($7,500/year for Fundamentals), audit support from in-house compliance staff and former auditors, or CMMC readiness through Secureframe Defense with SPRS scoring, SSP and POA&M generation.
Competing with Drata or Secureframe?
Enter your website and we'll show you who you're really up against, including the companies you're not watching yet.
Free. Takes about 30 seconds. No card.
- Secureframe
- OneTrust
- AuditBoard
- Hyperproof
- Scrut Automation
- Thoropass
Our take
Both vendors sell multi-framework compliance automation, so the split is packaging and vertical focus. Drata bundles agentic third-party risk management, an MCP connector and an EU CRA framework into one release and is pushing AI agent governance as a standalone category, while publishing no dollar amounts and capping Foundation at 50 FTEs. Secureframe prices Fundamentals at $7,500/year, keeps Complete and Defense quote-only, and is staffing a founding Defense sales team with a Microsoft co-hosted CMMC webinar behind it. Buyers comparing the two should weigh Drata's single-platform breadth against Secureframe's priced entry tier and defense-specific CMMC tooling.
Sources: B2B SaaS Competitive Positioning: AI Agent Framing · Drata: 83% Report Third-Party Breaches — October 2026
Sources
The facts on this page come from these sources: vendor pricing and product pages, review sites, press and public posts, each checked on the date shown.
- Unknown pageSupports: Drata is recasting AI agent governance as a standalone category while shipping agentic TPRM and an MCP connector, giving enterprise buyers a single-platform story that can pull budget away from narrow
- Unknown pageSupports: Secureframe is recruiting SMB and Enterprise Account Executives for a founding Defense sales team aimed at the Defense Industrial Base, paired with a Nov 10 CMMC webinar co-hosted with Microsoft's DIB
- Unknown postSupports: Secureframe is recruiting SMB and Enterprise Account Executives for a founding Defense sales team aimed at the Defense Industrial Base, paired with a Nov 10 CMMC webinar co-hosted with Microsoft's DIB
- Unknown postSupports: Key differentiator: In-house compliance and former-auditor team, Comply AI remediation, and Secureframe Defense with SPRS scoring, SSP and POA&M generation
Why a vendor comparison goes stale — and how fast
A like-for-like snapshot is true the week it’s written. It dates because the competitors themselves keep moving. Across the B2B SaaS competitors we monitor: we re-diff their public footprint every week, across 3,410 weekly comparisons (December 2025 – November 2026).
71.5%
changed their pricing page at least once
about 4 in 10
had a pricing change in a typical week
50.2%
changed their messaging in a typical week
Method: a “change” is a detected week-over-week diff on the monitored public page, excluding first-baseline records. Pooled across 221 competitors; computed live from IndustryLens monitoring and refreshed daily.